28/07/2010 12:00:00

Lawsuit Over $100 Million Art Collection Illegally Held by Hungary Will Resolve Largest Unsettled Holocaust Art Claim

Heirs to the Herzog Collection, the largest private art collection in

Hungary prior to World War II, filed suit in the United States District

Court for the District of Columbia late yesterday to seek the return of

artworks illegally held by Hungary since the Holocaust. The heirs are

also demanding a full and transparent inventory of looted art from the

Herzog Collection held by Hungary, marking the first time a request of

this nature has ever been made in an art restitution lawsuit.

The lawsuit seeks the return of over 40 artworks with a combined value

of over $100 million, including masterworks by El Greco, Francisco de

Zurbarán, and Lucas Cranach the Elder. The works come from the

collection of Baron Mór Lipót Herzog, a passionate Jewish art collector,

and the case is regarded by experts as the world’s largest unresolved

Holocaust art claim. Hungary, a WWII-era ally of Nazi Germany that

organized the dispossession, seizure, deportation, and eventual deaths

of more than 500,000 Hungarian Jews, has held the artworks since the

genocide of its Jewish population, despite years of negotiations and

international appeals for the collection’s return from multiple U.S.

Senators.

Major Works in Herzog Collection

Before his death in 1934, Baron Mór Lipót Herzog amassed approximately

2,500 paintings, sculptures, and other artworks in what was one of the

finest collections of art in all of Europe. Among the artworks at issue

in this case are:

  • The Agony in the Garden, an oil-on-canvas masterwork that was

    one of six El Greco paintings in the former Herzog Collection;

  • The Portrait of Don Balthasar Carlos, by Alonso Cano, the

    Spanish painter and sculptor known as “the Michelangelo of Spain”;

  • The Spring, by Gustave Courbet, the innovative French painter

    who lead the Realist movement in 19th-Century France; and

  • Portrait of a Woman (Lady with a Marguerite (Daisy)), by

    Camille Corot, the 19th-Century French landscape painter of whom the

    impressionist master Claude Monet said, “We are nothing compared to

    him, nothing.”

Case Summary

The complaint filed yesterday sets out the remarkable and disturbing

facts of the case, including:

  • At its peak, the Herzog Collection included approximately 2,500 works

    of art, including paintings by El Greco, Velázquez, Renoir, Corot, and

    Monet.

  • After the widow of Baron Mór Lipót Herzog died in 1940, the collection

    was passed to her three children: Erzsébet, István, and András.

  • Hungary sent András to a forced labor camp in 1942; he died on the

    Russian front in 1943. His daughters, who fled Hungary after their

    father’s deportation and death, are plaintiffs in this suit.

  • Hungary attempted to send István to the infamous Auschwitz camp,

    though he escaped to a safe house. The heirs of István and Erzsébet

    have assigned their interest in the Herzog Collection to David de

    Csepel, the lead plaintiff.

  • The Hungarian government worked hand-in-hand with the infamous Nazi SS

    commander Adolf Eichmann in organizing large-scale deportations of

    Hungarian Jews to German death camps. Between mid-May and July 1944,

    Hungarian authorities deported over 430,000 Jews, comprising more than

    50% of the Hungarian Jewish population.

  • In May 1944, the Hungarian Ministry of the Interior issued a decree

    requiring Jews to register all art objects in their possession.

  • The Herzog family attempted to save their artworks from damage and

    confiscation by hiding the bulk of it in the cellar of one of the

    family’s factories at Budafok. Dénes Csánky, director of the Museum of

    Fine Arts, assisted in packing and hiding the artworks. Despite their

    efforts to prevent the looting of the art, the Hungarian government

    and their Nazi collaborators discovered the hiding place (Csánky

    inventoried the treasures as they emerged). The seized artworks were

    taken to Adolf Eichmann, who selected many of the best pieces of the

    collection, first displaying his “trophies” and then shipping them to

    Germany. The remainder was handed over by the Hungarian government to

    the Museum of Fine Arts for safekeeping.

  • Under the 1947 Treaty of Peace between Hungary and the Allies,

    ownership rights to the Herzog Collection remained with the Herzog

    heirs.

  • The artworks that are the subject of this lawsuit are among the main

    attractions at Hungary’s Museum of Fine Arts and the Hungarian

    National Galley. One guidebook to the Museum of Fine Arts includes

    four art works from the collection, including El Greco’s The Agony

    in the Garden, while another guidebook includes two artworks from

    the collection.

  • The museums display works from the Herzog Collection prominently and

    have included tags identifying them as being “from the Herzog

    Collection.”

  • The museums have promoted and distributed books, including Treasures

    of Venice: Paintings from the Museum of Fine Arts, Budapest, that

    include works from the Herzog Collection.

  • The Budapest University of Technology and Economics and the Museum of

    Applied Arts in Budapest also possess artworks from the Herzog

    Collection.

  • At the 1998 Washington Conference on Holocaust-Era Assets, an

international conference on the persistent issues surrounding

Nazi-looted art, the Hungarian government pledged that it was “fully

committed to the restitution or compensation of Holocaust victims

concerning cultural assets. For managing this complex task . . . a

state commissioner will be designated.” Twelve years later, no

commissioner has been appointed.

Statements

The following are comments from the Herzog heirs, their counsel, and

experts on Holocaust-era art recovery:

Michael S. Shuster of Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman LLP,

the lead attorney in the Herzog lawsuit, stated:

  • “In the area of Holocaust restitution, the government of Hungary has

    been a particularly bad actor. Hungary attempts to portray itself as a

    nation worthy of our respect and investment, while refusing to comply

    with its basic obligations under international law.”

  • “In contrast to Hungary, Germany returned artworks from the Herzog

    Collection to the Herzog heirs this spring without need for legal

    action. We had no choice but to bring the Herzog family’s claim before

    a U.S. court.”

Martha Nierenberg, the daughter of Erzsébet (Herzog) Weiss de

Csepel, who fled the Hungarian Holocaust with her family in 1944 and has

long championed efforts for the return of the collection, stated:

  • “Hungary knows what is the right thing to do. Hungary chooses instead

    to do the wrong thing. It is sad that the Hungarian government would

    bring shame on its people by behaving this way, so long after the rest

    of the world has recognized the horror of the Holocaust.”

  • “I hope this lawsuit will restore what was lost to my family and has

    been held hostage by the government of Hungary for more than half a

    century.”

David de Csepel, the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit and grandson

of Erzsébet (Herzog) Weiss de Csepel, stated:

  • “We bring this lawsuit in remembrance of our ancestors who lost their

    homes and lives in the Holocaust. We are only requesting the property

    that was taken from them, our remaining connection to a proud family

    history. That can’t be too much to ask.”

  • “We will continue the struggle of previous generations and fight for

    what rightfully belongs to our family.”

Charles Goldstein, counsel to the Commission for Art Recovery, a

not-for-profit organization that works to ensure that governments comply

with the Washington Principles for Holocaust-era looted art, stated:

  • “Repeatedly failing to live up to its treaty obligations and

    commitments to the Washington Principles and Terezín Declaration,

    Hungary must acknowledge its actions during the Holocaust and return

    the Herzog art.”

  • “Hungary’s vulgarity and recklessness in refusing to return the art

    that it has illegally held is unparalleled. The country’s inaction is

    a stain on its people and all of Europe.”

Constance Lowenthal, Ph.D., art historian and former executive

director of the International Foundation for Art Research, said:

  • “Baron Mór Lipót Herzog’s art collection was the greatest in pre-war

    Hungary. Among his most important Old Master paintings were several

    major El Grecos (the magnificent “Agony in the Garden” and the

    powerful “Saint Andrew”), a wonderful early Lucas Cranach the Elder

    (“The Annunciation to Saint Joachim”), and a great rarity, a painting

    by the father of Raphael, Giovanni Santi. He also loved and collected

    more modern works by leading French painters -- Corot, Courbet, Monet,

    and Renoir.”

  • “Herzog had museum-quality works of art, and he combined great

    paintings, renaissance furniture and sculpture, and precious objects

    to create an atmosphere to delight any connoisseur. The Herzog

    Collection was comparable to the best house museums we know today --

    The Frick Collection in New York and The Wallace Collection in London.”

László Mravik, author of Sacco di Budapest, the

authoritative catalog on Holocaust-era looted art from Hungarian art

collections, said:

  • “The Hungarian government’s refusal to return Holocaust-era looted art

    is shameful. The government should have negotiated and settled with

    the heirs a long time ago. Hungary cannot build its national art

    collection through court battles to retain art that does not belong to

    its museums. I hope it is not too late to reach an amicable

    settlement.”

Additional materials, including a copy of the publicly filed complaint

and photos of the artwork, are available online at https://www.hungarylootedart.com/.

Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman LLP

Michael S. Shuster,

212-506-1700

mshuster@kasowitz.com

Del

Post comment

Related debate

  • 1 week
  • 1 month
  • 1 Year
17 Sep
CHEMM
Mullen jeg tror du hænger meget fast i hvordan markedet så ud for ½ år tilbage. Vi har i mellemtiden..
38
18 Sep
DANSKE
Her er lidt om de Berlingske løgnhistorier o Danske Bank - for det tilfælde I har lyst til at anlægg..
29
17 Sep
 
Kære EI,   Jeg har stor forståelse for at i skal tjene penge, for at kunne ove ville udbyde de ydels..
23
18 Sep
DANSKE
Hvor er dog dejligt at der er en journalist der går lidt dybere og ser hvad journalistik kan bruges ..
16
16 Sep
 
Jeg har skrevet til Nordnet at de bør beholde det gamle nordnet da jeg synes at det nye er noget bra..
16
19 Sep
DANSKE
ref 417838   Det er jo bare endnu en ubegavet journalist fra Berlingeren, der ikke ved en dyt om, Ja..
13
16 Sep
 
Det nye system er dybt uheldigt, både ifht. overblik - men også ifht. lay-out.    Nordnet kunne gøre..
13
20 Sep
VWS
Mon ikke lige vi skal spise brød til, inden vi konkluderer af GE løber med sejren. De har end ikke d..
12
16 Sep
VELO
Velkommen til ugens faste tråd om Veloxis & Envarsus 😊   Det har været endnu en stille uge for Velo..
12
18 Sep
DANSKE
INVESTOR1 : Jeg tror blot vi aktionærer i Danske Bank, er lidt mere vel afbalanceret som helhed. Vi ..
11

#

EuroInvestor: In Focus
#

#

EuroInvestor: In Focus
#

#

EuroInvestor: In Focus
#

Most read news

  • 24 hours
  • 48 hours
  • 1 week

Copyright Berlingske Media 2019  Cookie- and Privacy policy  |  Cookies  |   General terms of trade  |   Terms of use and IP rights
Quote information is delivered by Morningstar.
Data is delayed 15-20 minutes according to the distribution agreements set by the different exchanges.
 
23 September 2019 01:34:44
(UTC+00:00) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London
Version: LiveBranchBuild_20190829.2 - EUROWEB2 - 2019-09-23 02:34:44 - 2019-09-23 01:34:44 - 1000 - Website: OKAY